🔗 Share this article

Europe breathed a deep collective sigh of relief on Monday, as the diplomatic emergency triggered by the announcement of a new 28-point plan for ending the war appeared – temporarily – to have been defused. A American diplomat spoke of "substantial progress" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its response: a renewed assault of rocket attacks on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Peace Talks and Military Action

The succession of contrasting events captured the grim essence of the recent timeframe. By day, diplomatic battles are conducted: positive announcements are delivered from multiple capitals. Immense energy is expended on containing specific proposals. By night, Russian leadership brutally reminds the world that, for them, military action persists as the key method for achieving "settlement".

After-Dark Attacks

As Russia's attack unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's vulnerability was laid bare. Ukraine is equipped to monitor rocket firings from Russian territory, a capacity afforded by current data. From vantage locations, Ukrainian air force fighter jets that had been dispatched to intercept incoming aerial threats flew past – advanced fighter aircraft delivered to Ukraine by Western partners.

Shortly after, Kyiv's air-defence systems thundered: several firings deployed against a Russian ballistic missile. This was a sophisticated defense system at work, most likely provided by allied countries. Every launch creates sudden vibrations, causing tremors. The instant of fear quickly becomes grim resignation: maybe the hostile projectile won't hit its mark this time, protecting urban areas from ruin and further power outages.

Persistent Threats

Not long after, a automatic firearm engaged a drone somewhere nearby, part of a rapid response unit – probably allied-provided weaponry. Regrettably, the shots failed to hit the enemy aircraft – it continued its flight toward its target.

With pauses, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the early updates: multiple fatalities, devastation and utility failures in multiple buildings as a result of the nocturnal offensive. As always, everyone still continued their routines – living the war. But those entire period encapsulated Ukraine's critical military reliance on external assistance – a dependence that regional partners are demonstrably unable to replace in the near term.

Ineffective Peace Efforts

The 28-point plan from US administration sparked intense emotion, controversy and serious worry – and momentarily shifted focus from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have experienced comparable situations, after previous diplomatic encounters and multilateral gatherings.

Every new initiative from US leadership adheres to the identical sequence: a political offensive against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with other European capitals, effectively counters. They manage the tension but never actually win the battle. This pattern will, undoubtedly, persist.

Tactical Assessments

It is tempting to accuse certain parties of consistently pushing Kremlin's demands. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. Washington operates on a principle well known to seasoned negotiators: you cannot win at the negotiating table what you have failed to defend militarily. The American government assumes that it is unfeasible to compel Moscow to surrender the areas that it currently occupies in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The problem is that while accepting these circumstances, American administration does little to prevent Kremlin actions, through words or deeds, from thinking that the current condition will not change more in its advantage in the coming year.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, Moscow is certain that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its allies are coming close to fatigue. Their incentive to accept conditions that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is almost completely absent. There may be multiple initiatives to achieve ceasefire, but they will carry on as long as Russia's government remains highly assured in the conclusion.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still persist, slowly losing lives and land but preventing a entire defensive failure until conditions improve in its benefit.

Present Conditions

Factually, there are no real preconditions for a armistice. Now, personal considerations are coming into play: personal goals to broker a ceasefire and achieve global acclaim, and the government's twin challenges – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the country's interests against any plan Kyiv finds unsuitable, so that their priority does not switch to homefront challenges. And although their objective will now be significantly challenging after latest incidents, it remains highly unlikely that this will change their overall approach.

These two forces are influencing discussions.

Summary and Prospects

It took a only one week to kill the suggested clauses of the current initiative. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by Washington, pushback by Ukraine and the rest of Europe, along with pacifying measures of diplomats, and finally, latest revelations, all did their job.

While new initiatives based on established approaches are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should arrive at a critical understanding: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off diplomatic offensives from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and demonstrate certain reluctance to alter the situation, if they maintain solidarity and strengthen their defence capabilities at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to overcome them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to defend against evening bombardments will, for the coming months, primarily depend on sustained allied backing.